<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Softimage Scaling Anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/84/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/84</link>
	<description>People and thoughts behind XSI in production...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brent McPherson</title>
		<link>http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/84#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent McPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=84#comment-857</guid>
		<description>Glad you found this useful.

I wouldn''t describe classical scaling as inferior. It is more a matter of history. Softimage scaling dates back to the days before XSI and has been around in Softimage products for over a decade.

Therefore, you should use whichever one you are most comfortable with or whichever solution fits your needs better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you found this useful.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8221;t describe classical scaling as inferior. It is more a matter of history. Softimage scaling dates back to the days before XSI and has been around in Softimage products for over a decade.</p>
<p>Therefore, you should use whichever one you are most comfortable with or whichever solution fits your needs better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Nightingale</title>
		<link>http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/84#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Nightingale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 03:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=84#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this! Maybe it would be good idea to add this notion into XSI 6.0 Tips and Tricks DVD :)

I''ve been really long making ma hairs grey trying to figure out what is happening often when the answer was actually that easy. Article is nice, but all I undestand was that classical scaling is cool but it is too simple and inferior to SI scaling. So basically if you want to be hip, go and use SI scaling, it is nothing that  your brain cells die in a accelerated mode but this way you can be cool and thats what counts :p
No really, I am missing the point here seems but that''s ok.
Thanks for the tip again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this! Maybe it would be good idea to add this notion into XSI 6.0 Tips and Tricks DVD :)</p>
<p>I&#8221;ve been really long making ma hairs grey trying to figure out what is happening often when the answer was actually that easy. Article is nice, but all I undestand was that classical scaling is cool but it is too simple and inferior to SI scaling. So basically if you want to be hip, go and use SI scaling, it is nothing that  your brain cells die in a accelerated mode but this way you can be cool and thats what counts :p<br />
No really, I am missing the point here seems but that&#8217;&#8217;s ok.<br />
Thanks for the tip again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Peer</title>
		<link>http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/84#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Peer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=84#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Brent,

This is great as I had this happen to me just recently when I tried to scale some objects and could not get them all to scale under a parent the waI wanted. For the life of me I could not figure t out. Now it makes sense and it''s going to be of great benefit.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent,</p>
<p>This is great as I had this happen to me just recently when I tried to scale some objects and could not get them all to scale under a parent the waI wanted. For the life of me I could not figure t out. Now it makes sense and it&#8217;&#8217;s going to be of great benefit.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/84#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=84#comment-726</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Brent, thanks for the explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Brent, thanks for the explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
