<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How imf_disp connects to mental ray and how to connect to a running instance of mental ray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/122/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/122</link>
	<description>People and thoughts behind XSI in production...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Akita</title>
		<link>http://www.xsi-blog.com/archives/122#comment-16075</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Akita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xsi-blog.com/?p=122#comment-16075</guid>
		<description>Kim - excellent article.  Very handy stuff.

I did notice that the port number mental ray uses *changes*.  Meaning the port used for rendering seems to get rotated around between when you launch/exit XSI.  

Would this work if you had more than 1 render running on the same machine?  E.G. would 2 renders running on the same machine (different cpus) be able to sidestep each other using this method?

-T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim - excellent article.  Very handy stuff.</p>
<p>I did notice that the port number mental ray uses *changes*.  Meaning the port used for rendering seems to get rotated around between when you launch/exit XSI.  </p>
<p>Would this work if you had more than 1 render running on the same machine?  E.G. would 2 renders running on the same machine (different cpus) be able to sidestep each other using this method?</p>
<p>-T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
